WTF, Proudhon?
Aug. 16th, 2011 10:06 pmFRTDNEATJ, I was browsing "What Is Property?", by Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, an early 19th century socialist and anarchist (he's the one who said that property is theft). He's in the middle of a passage about equality and how you can only get a society of equals among members of the same species (not between man and animal, or between man and God), and then comes something hidden away in a little footnote:
Between woman and man there may exist love, passion, ties of custom, and the like; but there is no real society. Man and woman are not companions. The difference of the sexes places a barrier between them, like that placed between animals by a difference of race. Consequently, far from advocating what is now called the emancipation of woman, I should incline, rather, if there were no other alternative, to exclude her from society.
*boggles* Yeah, I don't even know what to say. Living in the 19th century is not an excuse--Emma Goldman would KICK his ASS.
Between woman and man there may exist love, passion, ties of custom, and the like; but there is no real society. Man and woman are not companions. The difference of the sexes places a barrier between them, like that placed between animals by a difference of race. Consequently, far from advocating what is now called the emancipation of woman, I should incline, rather, if there were no other alternative, to exclude her from society.
*boggles* Yeah, I don't even know what to say. Living in the 19th century is not an excuse--Emma Goldman would KICK his ASS.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-08-17 12:52 am (UTC)For a bigger giggle try Clara Zetkin on Lenin on the Woman Question by Engels. Or rather, don't. (I was a flag waving Marxist-Leninist back in the day). She breathlessly describes the thinker under review:
Lenin listened attentively, his body inclined forward slightly, following, without a trace of boredom, impatience or weariness, even incidental matters.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-08-17 11:45 am (UTC)I'd love to think that she literally might have, but he seems to have died before she was born.
Lenin listened attentively, his body inclined forward slightly, following, without a trace of boredom, impatience or weariness, even incidental matters.
Ahaha, her descriptions of Lenin.
Also, I've probably said this before, but I love that icon!
(no subject)
Date: 2011-08-17 04:06 pm (UTC)shall, I hope, outlive, Lenin's martial certainties.
Ta re icon. It turns out to be useful in a wide range of contexts :,)
(no subject)
Date: 2011-08-17 06:27 pm (UTC)